Love, interest, therefore the inhibition from viewpoint from personal choices

Love, interest, therefore the inhibition from viewpoint from personal choices

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you will Person Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place off connection into the individual mating. Summary of Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Web sites contradiction reviewed. Diary from Societal Circumstances, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites contradiction: A social technical you to definitely reduces social engagement and you can mental really-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), amerikanske kontra europГ¦iske kvinder 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.Yards., & Industries, J. Meters. (2001). Amount, timing, and you will duration of marriage ceremonies and divorces. Newest Population Accounts, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional analysis out-of intimacy, welfare, and partnership: Research the newest assumptions of your own triangular concept off love. Psychological Accounts, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step three.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Effect best regarding the undertaking tough: Personal contrasting contained in this close dating. Journal of Identification and Personal Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: New implicit cognition from personal competition. Log off Identity and Personal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.

Good. (2001)mitment and matchmaking repair systems

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to help you attractive solutions: Brand new advanced therapy out of dating fix. Evolution and Individual Choices, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential data from dispute and you can agreement in the troubled and nondistressed relationship couples. Journal off Asking and you will Medical Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Green, Good. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationship development online: What’s the huge destination? Record off Societal Activities, 58(1), 9–30.

Some great benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization as well as the structure off fulfillment during the intimate dating

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-evaluation objectives into the romantic dating: A style of in the world enhancement and you can certain confirmation. In the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents in the study of few communication (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge College Force.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-counselor bond through the contact lens of connection concept. Psychotherapy: Theory, Look, Habit, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The newest societal keeping track of program: Enhanced sensitivity in order to public signs because a transformative a reaction to social exception to this rule. For the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh new social outcast: Ostracism, personal difference, getting rejected, and you can intimidation (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Psychology Push.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). International and you will certain relational habits regarding the contact with societal affairs. Record regarding Character and you will Social Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An effective., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you will guidance looking to during the close matchmaking. Character and you will Social Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you may particular connection representations for the adulthood: Can there be a love?. Diary From Social And private Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. From inside the J. Harvey & Good. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal close relationships: Repairs and you may improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection actually perception one of spouses while the a function of the fresh new resemblance within their shared experience. Character And you will Societal Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience out-of extrinsic rewards on taste and you can enjoying. Record of Identification and you will Social Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *